Twin feeder antenna coupler designs-Antenna Lessons from the Old Timers

Tune Around! Project also includes a novel way of getting the rf to and from the shack using coax rather than ladder line. Shown with standard TV type ohm ribbon line. If you don't have room for the or 80 meter version Just remember, don't operate it on a lower frequency than it was designed for

Twin feeder antenna coupler designs

Twin feeder antenna coupler designs

From this location, I separate the wires Fucking a female in bc make antennx horizontal fan from the center point so that there is a 5 foot separation at the fence. I can't install it on my car Only Twin feeder antenna coupler designs legs tuned for the band in use present a matched impedance and radiate. What exactly is "reflected energy" and why does antena balanced open line necessarily exhibit radiated pattern distortion? The rig's happy again. Two inches is not. For example, 0. Running it in poly pipe will Twin feeder antenna coupler designs significant dielectric loss. Doesn't need to.

Differant sex positions. G5RV antenna basics

Total Pageviews. All rights reserved. The critical lengths Twin feeder antenna coupler designs B, C, and E then adjust the feedpoint to find a perfect Twin feeder antenna coupler designs. The last requirement applies equally at all frequencies. As well as some designss advice, Tony offered to make me the traps and the entire antenna system. Noise is low, much lower than my previous coax fed antenna systems. Subscribe to: Post Comments Atom. These antennas are coupled to their transmitters without transmission linesgenerally for lack of space. It is also relatively cheap, and far less expensive than waveguide. Newer Post Older Post Home. Being a half wave, there is always two opposite poles on the tips at each half cycle. Post a Comment. It is set by default to 0. Quickie Pneumatic Antenna Launcher. Notes on Directional Couplers for HF.

Call Search.

  • Post a Comment.
  • Beautiful project, congratulations!

All Rights Reserved. Please recognize that an antenna need not be resonant in order to be an effective radiator.

There is in fact nothing magic about having a resonant antenna, provided of course that you can devise some efficient means to feed the antenna. Many amateurs use non-resonant even random-length antennas fed with open-wire transmission lines and antenna tuners. They radiate signals just as well as those using coaxial cable and resonant antennas, and as a bonus they usually can use these antenna systems on multiple frequency bands.

The problem is getting power to it—coax is very lossy due to dielectric heating unless terminated into its characteristic impedance, and this effect is what leads many hams to erroneously believe that non-resonant antennas are inefficient.

With ohm open-wire line, the SWR is only 5. In this case, ohm line would be even better, because its characteristic impedance is closer to the geometric mean, so the SWR only varies from about at 50 ohms to 7. So we see that ladder-line is not only better for non-resonant antennas because of its much lower loss at high SWR, but also because its characteristic impedance places it nearer the geometric mean of the antenna's impedance range, from lowest odd half-waves to highest even half-waves.

See also: my feed-line calculator. Another popular myth is that antenna tuners are very lossy and waste a bunch of power. If your tuner is getting hot, you have something wrong in the antenna system, and are exceeding the design limits of the tuner.

See the graph at this article by G3TXQ. On the other hand, baluns can be very lossy, depending on the design and how they are used or misused. As with tuners, if they are getting hot, they are wasting power, and you need to change the feed-line length to move the anti-node out of the ham band , and use a balun designed for wide impedance variations. Traditional baluns, such as the coax-wound toroidal Guanella, are not designed to handle the extreme impedance variations of all-band doublets.

They tend to arc or saturate and burn up at high power when presented with impedance extremes. Modern balun manufacturers have discovered this and now make choke-baluns designed for ladder line feeds. If you run an all-band dipole with a tuner in the shack , you need ladder-line.

Coax is very lossy when operated at high SWR. Great article. Question though. Searching the internet gives all kinds of answers to what type of balun to use. Some say others say I plan to run the LL to the balun mounted outside and then a run of coax to a Mfj tuner. What would your suggestion be for the balun type and LL length? Howdy Kenneth, For length recommendations, please see the remaining pages of the article, particularly ladder line page 3.

Various RF engineers are now recommending against using baluns on LL-fed non-resonant antennas, because 1 at some frequencies where the shack-end of the line is low, and a makes it 4x lower sometimes way too low ; and 2 baluns lose common-mode choking ability when operating in mismatched conditions.

I have a fan dipole for ,75,40 meters cut to length on each leg to have low S. Can I feed it with ladder line and get rid of coax cable or should I build A new dipole for ,75,40 meters and feed it with ladder line I have manual tuners and auto tuners too. Let me know what to do with the dipoles is the fan dipole as good as the single wire dipole fed with ladder line.

I been reading articles on coax and ladder line I get confused on what I am reading I need help on what to do the bands I talk on it is ,75, and a little bit on 40 meters thanks I need help on what to do. Paul Wozniak…kb9vwd. The only reason to use ladder line is when you wanna run several bands on one dipole and the SWR is very high.

But on resonant dipoles coax is fine, and easier to use. Hi, I am just installing a sky loop with a fundamental of 1. The height is 60 ft using 4 tree supports and my tower. My question is ,, my tower is 45 mtr, , what do you think of running the tower legs to ft,,, one tower leg is ft the other is ft.

The remainders will run at 60ft. This will give me two legs sloping to ft… What do you think about the horizontal and vertical patterns,and impedance matching? Kindest regards Carl. It will also have slightly lower ground losses on But do consider balance. If you run it sloping, best to feed it in the middle of the low side, so its halves will be balanced with respect to ground, and thus keep your feed-line balanced.

Thanks for the quick reply!!! Yes it is fed in the middle of the low point. Tunes up on all bands apart from 28, so I will trim and try for that. I think that may be just asking a bit much. I have just tried out on 20, and works superb, just had a mobile from Italy who was at the noise level, but gave me 5 by 5. Getting close to installing a doublet at home. I have an ash tree in one end of my backyard, no trees at the end where the basement shack is near water supply for grounding, etc.

Straight shot, except that I have a drop ceiling that uses metal framing to hold up the [some kind of wood fiber] ceiling panels. Is it even safe to run the ladder line like that, attached to joists above a drop ceiling? Option 2: just run the LL outside the house, all the way to the shack and in through a basement window there.

Then the LL would drop down to the entry point. Either way, I live in an area that gets a fair amount of snow. Hmmm, interesting problem. But what you can do is reduce the width of the LL to one-inch, or even half-inch, window line right after you come in and run that above the ceiling.

The narrower line will have a much smaller magnetic field, assuming the antenna is pretty well balanced. Or maybe drill pairs of small holes, spaced an inch or so, through all the joists and get the wires a few inches higher. Lotsa holes! Naaa, too much work! Run them right together, taped every couple feet. Might need to put a choke balun at the entrance point, if needed. BUT, it tunes! I might have to adjust it a bit to get 12m and 10m to behave. I could not be happier. Thanks for your help.

Sounds great! If you wanna make it even better, a few things come to mind. Get the apex higher. That would considerably expand your NVIS low-band coverage, reduce RF in the house, reduce ground loss, and leave less wire bent on the fence. Eye-bolts and string to floating dog-bone insulators a couple feet out from pipe.

The bent ends can then be pulled to far corners of fence, sloping downward. What I did was make 3 coax jumpers, 2, 4, and 6 feet, then used the one that moved the wacky point above 29 MHz, which was at Plan to use LL feed point at a corner closest to the building. Post ground rod connected to service and several additional rods around building. What can be done to help this plan? If you use Hello KV5R This is a great site you have made.

Found it looking for information on Ladder Line. You have answered many of my questions in regards to making and terminating it in the shack. I have a question in regards to moister getting into the spacers between the feed lines. So I would say no. See my meter doublet.

There are a couple of farm co-ops near me that have the fence insulators you mention. Many thanks for all the info. I am planning to put up a foot center fed dipole fed with ladder line of course! I was going to use ohm open ladder line But your article above appears to suggest that ohm ladder line would be better for multiband operation due to lower SWR. I hope this this makes sense! I always thought baluns were preferred when connecting ladder line to the Antenna Tuner for the all band dipole.

It is too bad that he did not do research on the best type of balun for use with a L-network type Antenna Tuner. L type antenna tuners typically have lower losses than T-network type tuners. Baluns with a transformation ratio are only operating properly when they are terminated at or near their design impedances. A proper use for one would be feeding a resonant folded dipole Ohm feed-point with coax. The bifilar-wound toroidal-core balun performs much better at both balancing differential-mode currents, and choking common-mode current, over a wide impedance range.

They think using a will match the characteristic impedance of ladder line to that of coax, and thus make an easier job for the tuner. And it will, but only at low SWR! So, in the case of the non-resonant ladder-line-fed dipole or any other high-SWR system , the characteristic impedance of the line is completely meaningless, because it varies along the line.

These RF feeders need to have a number of properties if they are able to work well:. Have the antenna out in the open, then move the feedpoint up and down small amounts, and when a SWR is found, fix them there. The impedance seen by the tank circuit is adjusted by moving coil L 1 , or by changing the number of turns with a traveling short circuit. It is also relatively cheap, and far less expensive than waveguide. This is the best performing antenna I have found, it is also able to overcome the physical constraints of my back garden. Five turns, 6cm diameter for 70MHz.

Twin feeder antenna coupler designs

Twin feeder antenna coupler designs

Twin feeder antenna coupler designs. Recent Comments


G5RV Antenna | Electronics Notes

The design was originally devised in , but it was not until that it was published when it appeared in the July RSGB Bulletin. Over the years, the G5RV antenna has become a very popular form of antenna for many situations and several versions are commercially available, although it is relatively easy to make from wire, insulators and the feeder. There are two implementations of the G5RV antenna. The utilises 34 feet However when using this option it is best to incorporate a balun in the circuit.

Also the transmitter will need to have a suitable tuning capability or external tuning unit by the transmitter to ensure that it can match the antenna. The original G5RV antenna design included the circuit for a suitable tuning unit, although there are many tuning units that are able to provide a good match. It is necessary to ensure that there is a balanced to unbalanced transition, i.

The antenna tuning matching unit provides two functions. One is to match the impedance because. Like any antenna, it will not give an exact match. The second is to provide the balanced to unbalanced transition. Probably the best option is to use the antenna with an external or remote tuner unit and then the run though any building can be coaxial cable with a low VSWR. The antenna was originally designed in when the number of bands was much less than it is now.

In fact it was designed to meet the needs of the then bands: 80 metres, 40 metres, 20 metres and 10 metres. At this time, even 15 metres was not an allocated amateur radio band. In view of the number of different bands on which the antenna operates, the way in which it works is slightly different, i.

The antenna is very much a compromise and it presents a variety of different loads to the transmitter. On 20 metres the extended length means that the radiation lobes provide a lower angle of radiation in some direction and therefore it can favour long distance signals in the direction of the lobes as these will tend to arrive at a low angle.

The G5RV antenna has much going for it and it can provide an idea solution for many situations where a low cost multiband wire antenna is needed. Later adjustments took account of the different type of balanced feeders that could be used: Feeder Type Length Imperial Length Metric Open Wire 34 ft As a result it presents a reactive load it its input. Again the antenna presents a reactive load to any transmitter at its input.

As it represents an odd number of wavelengths it is fed at a current node and it is only slightly reactive. It gives a high impedance load which is slightly reactive. It is able to operate on all amateur bands between 80 metres and 10 metres. Featured articles.

Twin feeder antenna coupler designs